← Search

Jill de la Sota

Pittsford, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 42W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill de la Sota to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-02-14 · Makin' Shots-7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Crockett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · Makin' Shots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Norah Hegarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-01 · Makin' Shots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Medley-Evanetski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-25 · Makin' Shots · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Saffran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · Huntington, Reim · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-05-30 · Huntington, Reim · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marina Devito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-21 · Huntington, Reim · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Mcardle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2024-07-18 · Huntington (D), Woods · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Suri Brody / Julie Davidson
2024-07-17 · Huntington, Reim · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Rossetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-09 · Huntington, Rossetti/Wallace · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Crowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-26 · Huntington (D), Woods · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Nicolette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-24 · Huntington, Reim · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Reim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.4% of games
3.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 48.5% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 32.1% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer