← Search

Anna Hall

Nashville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 17W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Anna Hall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kylie Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-29 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shari Glickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
Cole Kelley / Kristen Conoley
2026-07-27 · McDonald/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Jean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
Grace Bryan / Justin Bryan
2026-07-26 · McDonald/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Jean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Farris/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Crews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
Stephanie Nelson / Cristi Plsek
2026-07-10 · McDonald/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Lahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · McDonald/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susanna Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · Farris/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Yglesias mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · McDonald/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katrena Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Holton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Holton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 46% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
4.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams