← Search

Shari Glickman

— year-end
216 matches · 117W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shari Glickman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-08-29 · Glickman/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie McAfee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Traci Holton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Jessica Davis / Saba Chishti
2026-08-22 · Glickman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Miles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Salada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-01 · Glickman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · Bargers/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Pomario mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Bargers/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Pomario mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Brandon/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Parker Hazlett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Bargers/Collins/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Mattise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · Bargers/Collins/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Carter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Buss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · Glickman/Nasvhille · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Traci Holton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Teams87 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 68.3% of games
3.5
69.1%
56W–25L · 56.6% of games
4.0
35.3%
12W–22L · 48.3% of games
7.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 50.4% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.6% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.9% of games
7.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.8% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
58 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert