← Search

Bruce Bendell

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 53W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bruce Bendell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
David Nelson / Michael MacHado
2026-09-01 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bret Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-11 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · GAC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Alec Wynne / Edward Hynek
2026-06-30 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregory Kaczmarczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · GAC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bret Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-5
W
2026-06-09 · GAC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · GAC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Mervak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Erdley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
55.7%
44W–35L · 51% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe