← Search

Gregory Kaczmarczyk

Aurora, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 22W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gregory Kaczmarczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-08-25 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with DAVID SERAFIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Russell Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Mervak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
James Bach / Christine Johnson
2026-07-26 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Younggren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-19 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Mervak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-05 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juliet Beckman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Alec Wynne / Edward Hynek
2026-06-30 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Bendell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-16 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Mervak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Mervak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-12 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronald Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 49.5% of games
4.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 42.6% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe