← Search

Emily Gerber

Upper Arlington, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 52W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Gerber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-01-09 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-19 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Kirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-21 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer DeCapua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · Racquet Club 4 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-26 · Racquet Club 4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yumi Willard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-18 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2024-04-12 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Nimjee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-05 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-01 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-23 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2022-12-02 · Racquet Club 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-11-18 · Racquet Club 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Freytag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
62.7%
37W–22L · 54.4% of games
3.5
20%
8W–32L · 40.2% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#2 Singles
20%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe