← Search

Mandi Grohoske

— year-end
256 matches · 141W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mandi Grohoske to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history256 matches
L
Lori Brown / Lois Dosky
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Wiese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Amber Scott / Heather Evans
2026-07-09 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kirsten Knodt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Wiese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Westwater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Budd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
L
2026-06-04 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Budd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Bradbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-20 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Hunnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-3
L
2026-04-16 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Caton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams54 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
61.9%
65W–40L · 55.8% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.2% of games
7.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 51.1% of games
7.5
51.6%
32W–30L · 52.8% of games
8.0
51.9%
27W–25L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
102 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer