← Search

Erica McIntyre

Columbus, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 85W–86L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Erica McIntyre to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-05-04 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Almasanu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-04-20 · Olympic 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lara Baumann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Alison Scott / Leah Wagenbrenner
2026-04-17 · Olympic 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-27 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Gockstetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-16 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lara Baumann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-09 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly Dye
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Krista Eckelman / Julia Wood
2026-03-06 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wendy Almasanu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-20 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Jenks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-02 · Olympic 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lara Baumann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-01-30 · Olympic 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Gockstetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
68%
34W–16L · 61.5% of games
3.5
37.8%
31W–51L · 46.8% of games
6.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 51.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
44 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova