← Search

Jeffrey Raihall

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 22W–25L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Raihall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-07-28 · ACAC Koch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · ACAC Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · ACAC Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Koch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · ACAC Koch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · ACAC Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · ACAC Hollomon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Ewald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · ACAC DELISIO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · ACAC Hollomon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Aschheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-29 · ACAC DELISIO · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anant Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-23 · ACAC Hollomon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-14 · ACAC DELISIO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anant Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-07 · ACAC DELISIO · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.3% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert