← Search

Charles Christianson

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 18W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Charles Christianson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-29 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Steve Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-21 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terence Blackwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · Willow Oaks - Burnett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Forsythe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Willow Oaks - Burnett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Byron Chafin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ivan Mullinax
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · Willow Oaks - Burnett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Stalls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · Willow Oaks - Burnett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Willow Oaks - Blackwood · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Willow Oaks Sibley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bill Dagostino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.1% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.4% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.4% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.5% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer