← Search

Alejandra Clemens

Woodburn, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 33W–29L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Alejandra Clemens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2025-06-07 · STSC-Wheeler Dealers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jay Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-09-22 · #1 Doubles · with David Barlow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2024-09-21 · #3 Doubles · with David Barlow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-08 · STSC-Jammers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-09 · S OR-STSC-Murphy-Barlow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Barlow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-06-09 · S OR-STSC-Murphy-Barlow · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Barlow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-08 · S OR-STSC-Murphy-Barlow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Barlow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-06-08 · S OR-STSC-Murphy-Barlow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Barlow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-19 · STSC-Moyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephenie Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-05-18 · STSC-Moyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trina Cooprider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-05 · STSC-Moyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2023-11-18 · STSC-Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.8% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.7% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 59.7% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe