← Search

Daniel Carlson

BIRMINGHAM, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 52W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Daniel Carlson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-07-20 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joel Abramson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-18 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · FAC-Mahmood 45 MEN SINGLES · #3 Singles · 4.5
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-16 · 1MONY-Escheck 85 COMBO MEN F · #2 Doubles · with Jake Stants
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-02 · 1MONY-Escheck 85 COMBO MEN F · #1 Doubles · with Jake Stants
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-07-15 · 5BT-ROSEN 40M TU 18&O SEM F4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-10 · 4DTS-TITUSKIN 40M TH 40&O SEM F3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-24 · 5BT-ROSEN 40M TU 18&O SEM F4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Young Woo Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
80%
40W–10L · 61.2% of games
4.5
16.7%
3W–15L · 35.1% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
14%
11 matches
#2 Singles
14%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer