← Search

Matthew McDonald

— year-end
63 matches · 34W–29L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Matthew McDonald to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-03-07 · TAOU-Vorsane · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Pitaniello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-28 · TAOU-Vorsane · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Igor Khomyakov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Mitchell John / Christopher Johnson
2026-02-21 · TAOU-Vorsane · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Perez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-07 · TAOU-Vorsane · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Igor Khomyakov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-31 · TAOU-Vorsane · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Bankhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-5
W
Francisco Rubio / Matt Groesbeck
2025-12-13 · TAOU-Vorsane · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Vorasane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Timothy Smith / James Watson
2025-12-06 · TAOU-Vorsane · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Igor Khomyakov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-15 · TAOU-Vorsane · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Taggart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-10-23 · Liberty Park-Vorsane · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Bankhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-19 · Hi-Tri Team · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Fong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-10-18 · Hi-Tri Team · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Vorasane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-18 · Hi-Tri Team · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Fong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.7% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 52.5% of games
8.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#2 Male Doubles
5%
3 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams