← Search

Chase Maeser

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 34W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chase Maeser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Daddies · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · New Daddy’s · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Conner Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-06 · New Daddy’s · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tomas Barrera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · New Daddy’s · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hall Humphrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Crowe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Nate McOmber / Gabriel Tapia
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · with Marty Pye championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brady Patrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marty Pye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Conner Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Jagolinzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marty Pye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 63% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 52.1% of games
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer