← Search

Karen Ebert Meyer

— year-end
174 matches · 75W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Ebert Meyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Parmentier/Upson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Mertens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-09 · Parmentier/Upson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Mertens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Parmentier/Upson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Mertens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Parmentier/Upson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Parmentier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · Hammond · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Brinker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Parmentier/Upson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brent Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-1
L
2026-05-20 · Hammond · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meaghan Harned
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Pietroburgo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martina Augsburger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-22 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth E Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Schwaegel (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Chiarolanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games
3.5
37.3%
44W–74L · 47.1% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
37 matches
#2 Singles
9%
16 matches
#1 Singles
9%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer