← Search

SHELLEY O'CONNOR

— year-end
94 matches · 55W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add SHELLEY O'CONNOR to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Carpenter/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Irvine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryann Shilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-17 · Martin/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Elizabeth Day / Lindsey Myers
2026-06-16 · Brackett/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · Martin/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnn Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Brackett/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophia Manshack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.2% of games
3.5
55.6%
30W–24L · 52.2% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.5% of games
6.5
68.8%
11W–5L · 59% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams