← Search

Lindsey Myers

— year-end
71 matches · 40W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lindsey Myers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ragan Washburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Jennifer Lee / Elza McKenna
2026-09-01 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Lackie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-27 · Washburn/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josie Hammons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-11 · Beanblossom/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie McDermott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · Tidwell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Sampson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eleanore Maynard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · Leavell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-23 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Terrie Dietsch / Heather Morgan
2026-06-23 · Tidwell/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Leavell/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-15 · Leavell/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-06 · Savage/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Kuhlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 56.4% of games
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 58.7% of games
3.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.5% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Singles
17%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer