← Search

Natalie Souder

— year-end
75 matches · 34W–41L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalie Souder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Lunsford/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Lauryn Yackel / Meredith Edwards
2026-08-29 · Wright/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jenni Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Gabriela Herbst / Kelly Baker
2026-08-25 · Wright/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rachel Spangler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Amy Worrell Sterling / Margaret Reid
2026-08-24 · Wright/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katherine Dorsett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · Wright/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alicia Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Hancock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · Denney/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Akil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Jeressia Williamson / Darrius Samples
2026-06-28 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · Denney/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · Denney/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · Gronostaj/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Breeana Crouch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams29 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.7% of games
3.0
56.7%
17W–13L · 51.1% of games
3.5
24%
6W–19L · 39.3% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.4% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 39% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert