← Search

Jigar Shah

Morganville, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 92W–41L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jigar Shah to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
Jaiganesh Narasimhamoorthy / Ramachandran Pilavulathil
2026-09-12 · Topspinners Tri-Level · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thulasiraja Kandaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · Smash & Splash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Juliana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · Smash & Splash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Juliana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · Honey Deuces Lovers! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Leighton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-3
W
2026-02-01 · Baseliners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Uday Bhamidipati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
L
2026-01-15 · Baseliners · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-20 · NJD/Honey Deuces · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Calaquian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-12-13 · Nassau Baseliners · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karthik Bala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-12-12 · CM Hackers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harish Srinivasan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-12-06 · NJD/Honey Deuces · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with JANET van MOL mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-22 · NJD/Honey Deuces · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tong Zhang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-15 · Nassau Baseliners · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
80%
48W–12L · 61.6% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.1% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 40.9% of games
7.0mixed
64.6%
31W–17L · 55.6% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
14%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe