← Search

Dan Holmes

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 35W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Holmes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-06-15 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veeresh Math
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chadd Cripe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-27 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veeresh Math
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veeresh Math
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-18 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Kukutla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brahma Reddy Yenumula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-02 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chadd Cripe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-07-02 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thierry Floch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-30 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veeresh Math
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-25 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thierry Floch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-16 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Kukutla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-11 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anil Kukutla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.1% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams