← Search

Linda van Roosmalen

— year-end
95 matches · 52W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda van Roosmalen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Glen Creek Pumas · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Allison Gesk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julie Lichtenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · Highland Park · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Ayers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
2026-07-11 · Highland Park · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sarah Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · Glen Creek Pumas · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Highland Park · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Glen Creek Pumas · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Gardiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Lobsters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Flinner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Lobsters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Flinner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-12-14 · Mt Lebanon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacquelyn Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Trevenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.1% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.8% of games
4.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
69%
20W–9L · 55.6% of games
8.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 26% of games
9.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova