← Search

Sarah Trbovic

— year-end
159 matches · 60W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Trbovic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Greensburg Go-Getters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marion Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · Mellon 2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mia Bernard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Mellon 2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-28 · Mellon 2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marni Pastor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Mellon 2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Reina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-17 · Greensburg Go-Getters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Klions
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Alpha · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Antin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · Alpha · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela McCrory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · Mellon 2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Reina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-30 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arla Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-26 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arla Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Arla Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.5% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 28.4% of games
4.0
39.2%
29W–45L · 45.1% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 26.4% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 48.3% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 37% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert