← Search

Randall van Roekel

— year-end
46 matches · 14W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Randall van Roekel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-07-07 · SS-H RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Viss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · SS-H RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Babb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · SS-H RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Gesink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · SS-H RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Viss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-19 · SS-H RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Viss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-01 · SS-H GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Gesink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-24 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-20 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-30 · SS-H GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Babb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-16 · SS-H BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Barnhill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-07-09 · SS-H BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis Lezotte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-07-02 · SS-H BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathanael Shue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
31.8%
14W–30L · 44.2% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams