← Search

Stephanie Teodosio

— year-end
121 matches · 60W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Teodosio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-07-14 · A40 3.5W LT Mathia · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Mazzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W LT Mathia · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Mazzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · A40 3.5W LT Mathia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Huscroft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Mazzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Shockey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Shockey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · A18 3.5W LT1 Barr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Kara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-24 · A18 3.0W LT1 Banas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Serdinak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-07-09 · A40 3.5W LT1 Barr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Kara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-08 · A40 3.0W LT2 Sirak · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clare Stacey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 73.5% of games
3.5
53.4%
31W–27L · 49.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 32% of games
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 46.2% of games
7.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer