← Search

Joan Kerosky

Cortland, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 121W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joan Kerosky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-07-14 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with FERNANDA BALEN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Loreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-01 · A65 7.0W CV Lovejoy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-22 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-17 · A65 7.0W CV Lovejoy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Constance Croasdaile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Loreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · A65 7.0W CV Lovejoy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Loreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · A55 7.0W D TP Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
Vivian Smith / Connie Wang
2026-06-03 · A65 7.0W CV Lovejoy · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Constance Croasdaile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-02 · A40 3.5W AVB Kerosky · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Loreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 40.6% of games
3.5
70.2%
33W–14L · 57.1% of games
4.0
22.2%
4W–14L · 42.6% of games
6.5
64.5%
20W–11L · 60.2% of games
7.0
49.2%
29W–30L · 51.6% of games
7.5
59%
23W–16L · 54.3% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 40.7% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
67 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King