← Search

Percy Young

— year-end
164 matches · 78W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Percy Young to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christoph Schmidt-Warnecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-06 · Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nirmal Choradia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Leibowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · Chilton- Team Beast · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cassie Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nirmal Choradia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Leibowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · Chilton- Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cassie Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · declined/Waller/18&over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thi Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · Chilton- Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cassie Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · Team Beast · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christoph Schmidt-Warnecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Chilton- Team Beast · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Limke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · declined/Waller/18&over9.0X · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimberly Buzbee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
26W–13L · 56.4% of games
4.5
25.5%
13W–38L · 40.1% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.9% of games
7.0
80%
16W–4L · 65.2% of games
8.0
38.7%
12W–19L · 48% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal