← Search

Rip Royse

— year-end
193 matches · 92W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rip Royse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grant Woody
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-04 · Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Silas Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · Stokes 9.0 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Terry Stokes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kaleb Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · Stokes 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Ball Busters · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Hoesel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-12 · declined/Ogle/55&over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Shuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.3% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.3% of games
4.0
59.8%
55W–37L · 53.8% of games
4.5
33.9%
19W–37L · 45.4% of games
8.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.1% of games
9.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer