← Search

Jamie Hayes

Edmond, OK
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 44W–12L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Jamie Hayes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Hayes/White · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rip Royse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rip Royse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Moore Woody · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rip Royse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · OK/Hays-Jennings18&over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · OK/Hays-Jennings18&over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dickson Howell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-09 · OK/Storch-Jennings/40&over 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Corbin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-09-25 · OK/Storch-Jennings/40&over 4.5M · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rip Royse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-06-22 · Jennings- Storch · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Cato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-06-17 · Jennings- Storch · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Cato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-05-16 · Jennings- Storch · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Cato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-05-08 · Jennings- Storch · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.7% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 61.1% of games
4.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.5% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#1 Singles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe