← Search

Janine Hoffer

RICHMOND, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 16W–7L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Janine Hoffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbey Orski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Sarah Boyd / Michelle Nelson
2026-08-14 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbey Orski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Herm Orski-Lines · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kandace McGinnis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-05 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-19 · Herm Orski-Lines · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Kersey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
Sarah Whitmore / Meredith Schwartz
2024-11-19 · Hermitage Williams · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with AMY LINES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-11-13 · Hermitage Williams · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with AMY LINES
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Heather Barefoot / Mary Snead
2024-06-11 · Hermitage- Williams · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristy Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2024-05-14 · Hermitage- Williams · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Caldwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-03-09 · Hermitage-Martin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Berens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-07-23 · #2 Doubles · with Joanna Bergeron championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-21 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Magnano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 65.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert