← Search

Jessica Marfeo

Warwick, RI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 81W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Marfeo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
L
2026-07-20 · WB: Maggiacomo/Simonini · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Adamczyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · WB: DePalma/Marfeo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Breting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · WB: Maggiacomo/Simonini · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · WB: Maggiacomo/Simonini · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-30 · WB: DePalma/Marfeo · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · WB: DePalma/Marfeo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Depalma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · WB: Maggiacomo/Simonini · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Simonini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · WB: DePalma/Marfeo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judith Simonini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · WB: DePalma/Marfeo · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · WB: DePalma/Marfeo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Depalma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · WB: Bomb Squad/Simonini/Piliero · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Paul Gottret mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · WB: Bomb Squad/Simonini/Piliero · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with MICHAEL FONTAINE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.7%
46W–20L · 58.2% of games
4.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
20 matches
#1 Singles
11%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova