← Search

Vanessa Gloer

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 89W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vanessa Gloer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-09-11 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristine Pelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · LOCH.Kasberg · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sue Sheldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · LOCH.Kasberg · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Starritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Starritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kara Hornada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · with Thaiza Gloer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · LOCH.Kasberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thaiza Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-23 · LOCH.Kasberg · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Sasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.6% of games
4.0
66.2%
53W–27L · 55.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 50.3% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
11%
15 matches
#1 Singles
8%
11 matches
#3 Singles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer