← Search

Emily Starritt

APEX, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
310 matches · 205W–105L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Starritt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history310 matches
L
Susan Fekete / Kelly Moore
2026-09-11 · MD.Park · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-10 · PDovel-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allyson Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-02 · MD.Park · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marcy Points
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · LOCH.Schwartz · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cait Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · MD.Park · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cait Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · PDovel-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Libby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-07 · MD.Park · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Spangenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · LOCH.Schwartz · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cait Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Barcinas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Rider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · MD.Park · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marcy Points
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · TOC.Rider · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vanessa Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · TOC.Barcinas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Reynders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.4% of games
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 70.3% of games
3.5
75.2%
88W–29L · 61.8% of games
4.0
56%
28W–22L · 51.7% of games
6.5
57.6%
19W–14L · 51.3% of games
7.5
58.7%
27W–19L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
72 matches
#2 Singles
8%
26 matches
#1 Singles
7%
20 matches
#3 Singles
6%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova