← Search

Laura McNiven

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
537 matches · 397W–140L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Laura McNiven to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history537 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ACP.Rider · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Suyeon Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-30 · Ki.Patrey18C8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nora Lenahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · Ch.Higgins40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nancy Pack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · ACP.Rider · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Suyeon Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-4
W
Jenny Nguyen / Yuwie Hager
2026-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Lindsay Murdock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Ki.Patrey18C8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nora Lenahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-03 · TOC.Graves · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Graves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Ki.Patrey18C8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nora Lenahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Li.Murdock18T · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sapna Varkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Ki.Patrey18S · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-19 · Ki.Patrey18S · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · TOC.Yao · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Kasari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams122 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 73.2% of games
3.5
80.7%
67W–16L · 63.4% of games
4.0
81.7%
107W–24L · 62.5% of games
4.5
48.3%
28W–30L · 48.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 60.8% of games
7.5
80%
48W–12L · 58.9% of games
8.5
48.9%
22W–23L · 49.9% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 75.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 74% of games
8.0mixed
89.3%
25W–3L · 65.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
266 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
156 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
95 matches
#1 Singles
2%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert