← Search

Jill Hauck

Lititz, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 151W–154L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Hauck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history305 matches
L
2025-11-15 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clint Keller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-14 · Hempfield - Baumer 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dudley Rowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-02 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anthony Battista mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-10-17 · Hempfield - Baumer 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Hauck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-14 · RCW Loose Strings (Johnson) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Clint Keller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-28 · Manheim Smashers - Hanula · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-25 · Manheim Smashers - Hanula · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Bonnie Nolt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-22 · Manheim Smashers - Hanula · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-07-21 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Strange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-19 · RCW- String Courtettes (Nolt) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Nolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-07-19 · Manheim Smashers - Hanula · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chrissy Eberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
32%
8W–17L · 42.8% of games
3.5
47.6%
20W–22L · 50.1% of games
6.0
75%
15W–5L · 63.9% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 56.9% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 62.8% of games
6.0mixed
54.2%
45W–38L · 50.1% of games
7.0mixed
39.4%
28W–43L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
81 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer