← Search

Dana Fisher

Ocean, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 59W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Fisher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-04-26 · Rock 'n Rollers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Gregoli mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-19 · Rock 'n Rollers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Weiss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-08 · Rock 'n Rollers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-12 · Favia · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ritch Belen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-12-15 · Team Favia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meredith Rocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-12-08 · Team Favia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-12-05 · Smashing Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Starke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-0
W
2024-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacylene Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-10-31 · Smashing Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Nied
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Lo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-10-10 · Smashing Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Mussio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
54.5%
24W–20L · 54.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 39.4% of games
8.0
80%
12W–3L · 61.7% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 48.4% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova