← Search

Mary Walsh

— year-end
149 matches · 95W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Walsh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-06-30 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Rocco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacylene Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seton McKeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meegan Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacylene Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-05 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seton McKeon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-03-17 · No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-17 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacylene Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-03 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacylene Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-01-20 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacylene Holloway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-01-16 · FALL SHORE/No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Egan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 67.2% of games
3.5
63.9%
62W–35L · 55.9% of games
4.0
40%
10W–15L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams