← Search

Eric Lamar

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 14W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Lamar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-05-13 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Fritsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Barben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-29 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pat Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-04-22 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ekedahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-21 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-07 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-23 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-04-16 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-29 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-08 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayes Trotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-05-05 · EM RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-04-24 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Ekedahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.7% of games
4.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert