← Search

Jeff Barton

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 55W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Barton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-06-17 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Fawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Fawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Shimek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jake Fell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-29 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jake Fell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · DTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-09 · DTC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-25 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-18 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-06-04 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-05-24 · DTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-21 · DTC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Fawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 58.5% of games
4.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 48.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 45.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams