← Search

Robert Timken

— year-end
99 matches · 34W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Robert Timken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-07-08 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MAAZ AHMED
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JEROME HILL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · X18 7.0 BR Timken · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Timken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blake Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Hannah Neely / Matthew Taylor
2026-06-19 · X18 7.0 BR Timken · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Timken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Rountree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · A55 7.0M NC Zabowski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randall Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tsai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · X18 7.0 BR Timken · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Parker Timken mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Tsai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-06 · A40 3.5M NC2 Paulino · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Beyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
29.5%
13W–31L · 42.6% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.3% of games
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 55.9% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 38.6% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert