← Search

Steve Gehring

— year-end
150 matches · 97W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Gehring to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-06-25 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-06-10 · A55 8.0M NC Currier · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Perdion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with NEIL MCHALE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · A40 3.5M LT Fiedler · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · X18 7.0 3 LT McKenzie · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Balc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · A40 3.5M LT Fiedler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Wirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Murali Shanker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitch Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · X40 7.0 LT McKenzie · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Balc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
71.4%
25W–10L · 58.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
63.9%
23W–13L · 54.2% of games
7.5
75%
15W–5L · 57.1% of games
8.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.1% of games
7.0mixed
63.9%
23W–13L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert