← Search

Steve Barker

— year-end
137 matches · 77W–60L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Steve Barker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-07-18 · X18 8.0 TP Schaffner · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brooke Kaylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · A55 7.0M TP Consilio · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Schulte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · A40 3.5M TP Bassak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Consilio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · X18 7.0 3 TP Rohrig · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Cheverine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · A40 3.5M TP Bassak · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Renz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · A40 3.5M TP Bassak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Renz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-26 · X18 7.0 3 TP Rohrig · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Consilio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-25 · A55 7.0M TP Consilio · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hassan Malik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · A40 3.5M TP Bassak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Kramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jeffrey Miller / Mitch Crawford
2026-06-18 · A55 7.0M TP Consilio · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hassan Malik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-12 · X18 7.0 3 TP Rohrig · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Cheverine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · A40 3.5M TP Bassak · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Consilio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 64.1% of games
3.5
50%
14W–14L · 48.2% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 51.6% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.1% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 54.3% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
27 matches
#1 Singles
12%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams