← Search

Alexis Maklakoff

Chapel Hill, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 41W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Alexis Maklakoff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-01 · BBlackburn.55C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nathan Bearman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · GDichter-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabriel Dichter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · GDichter-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Meltsner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · GDichter-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dan Clemson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · GDichter-CHTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · GDichter-CHTC · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · MHanauer-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · MHanauer-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gabriel Dichter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-21 · MHanauer-CHTC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Fernan Esquivel / Sergio Campos
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Giordano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Jerry Day / Kevin Cue
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · with Nathan Bearman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Blanton Hansen / Chris Micklitz
2025-10-17 · #2 Doubles · with Nathan Bearman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
80%
16W–4L · 61.3% of games
4.5
20%
2W–8L · 41.4% of games
8.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.3% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova