← Search

Erik J Erikson

DURHAM, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 161W–73L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Erik J Erikson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
W
2026-09-08 · EBlount.55.8.5C-HR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eric Lindblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-03 · EAnderson-DFC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brandon Garrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · EBlount.55.8.5C-HR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Eric Lindblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · TOC.Madia · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with W Troutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-29 · TOC.Morrow · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bryan Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · EBlount.55.8.5C-HR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Grose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · TOC.Morrow · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · EAnderson-DFC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charles Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · TOC.Madia · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with W Troutman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · EAnderson-DFC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rod Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · TOC.Morrow · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Tate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · TOC.Morrow · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
64.3%
45W–25L · 55.2% of games
8.5
70.9%
56W–23L · 57.3% of games
9.0
100%
8W–0L · 67.4% of games
4.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 60.7% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert