← Search

Luc Sanchez

DURHAM, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 41W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Luc Sanchez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-08-29 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laurence Isaacs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joshua Lundberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · JLundberg-DUR · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeron Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Anna Tomkins / William Hall
2026-07-30 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
Andrew Pham / Morgan Blount
2026-07-27 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · APlachco-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoe Dubrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
Casey Black / Karen Griffin
2026-06-29 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoe Dubrow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · JLundberg-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-08 · APlachco-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ana Plachco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-18 · APlachco-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sindhu Shivaji mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · JLundberg-DUR · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
4.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 69.5% of games
4.5
26.7%
12W–33L · 40.8% of games
8.5
50%
6W–6L · 48.2% of games
4.5mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 40.7% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#2 Singles
13%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#3 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams