← Search

Maura Lever

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 141W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maura Lever to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-09-03 · PW.Jacobsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cathy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-27 · PW.Jacobsen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna West
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-20 · PW.Jacobsen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Suddreth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-19 · MCP.Reinicker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · MCP.Reinicker · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · MCP.Reinicker · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · MCP.Reinicker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Emily Jones
2026-06-25 · MCP.Reinicker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · MCP.Reinicker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-28 · PW.Stylski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Burkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · PW.Short · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · PW.Stylski · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 65.1% of games
3.5
51.1%
71W–68L · 51.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–6L · 30.8% of games
6.5
57.6%
34W–25L · 53% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 21% of the time
#1 Doubles
21%
57 matches
#1 Singles
21%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
50 matches
#2 Singles
18%
49 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer