← Search

Jack Baur

Raleigh, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 89W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jack Baur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
W
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Frazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Nicolas Quevedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Jeff Cockayne / Peter Kelly
2026-08-01 · TOC.Byrd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-27 · Jo.Walker18T · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · Jo.Walker18T · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rayan Jabr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Jo.Walker18T · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-4
W
2026-07-07 · Jo.Walker18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gary Caiola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · Jo.Walker18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cameron Lange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · Jo.Walker18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Lange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · TOC.Byrd · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Samuel Lee / Grant McGrew
2026-05-17 · Jo.Walker18T · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with William Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · Mi.Saldana18A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Migel Hidalgo Saldana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.4% of games
4.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 49.9% of games
4.5
55.3%
26W–21L · 52.7% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 60.9% of games
8.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 57.8% of games
9.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
17%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
20 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova