← Search

Evan Bail

Overland Park, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 38W–15L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Evan Bail to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Bail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-13 · Fendler, Kathleen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Fendler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kandice Thurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · Geick, Susan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-01 · Geick, Susan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-11 · Geick, Susan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · Geick, Susan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shela Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 68.8% of games
4.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.7% of games
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Singles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer