← Search

Jessi Reed

Leawood, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 106W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jessi Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-09-13 · McDermed, Angie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Patt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · Abel, Alysen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with JOHN CRAIG mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyson Bollinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Abel, Alysen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Stolte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-11 · Mcdermed, Angie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · Abel, Alysen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-29 · Mcdermed, Angie · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Mcdermed, Angie · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trisha Jolliffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-02-01 · Mcdermed, Angie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-23 · Blackwell, Tiffany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-11-16 · Blackwell, Tiffany · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-26 · Blackwell, Tiffany · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Conley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.5% of games
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 58.3% of games
3.5
77.5%
31W–9L · 62.4% of games
4.0
63.5%
47W–27L · 55.9% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 30.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams