← Search

Kandice Thurman

— year-end
196 matches · 131W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kandice Thurman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
2026-06-23 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sanja Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carmen Kowalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Evan Bail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Fendler, Kathleen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sally McEntyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-05 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Theresa Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · Fendler, Kathleen · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Fendler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Susan Doerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-03-10 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brook Vitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-03 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Thomley Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-24 · Fendler, Kathleen · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-22 · Fendler, Kathleen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Thomley Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 63.6% of games
3.5
85.3%
29W–5L · 67.1% of games
4.0
72.7%
56W–21L · 60.3% of games
4.5
34.7%
17W–32L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 69.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
38 matches
#1 Singles
6%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams