← Search

Lesley Vancura

— year-end
44 matches · 26W–18L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Lesley Vancura to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-01-25 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Koopmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-09 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Odegaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-07 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Odegaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-01 · Brown: Elmcrest · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-23 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Odegaard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-12-21 · Brown: Elmcrest · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-11-23 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-11-09 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Dusek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2024-09-28 · Bemus & McKinstry: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-24 · Langdon · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kirby Dreher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-06-12 · Langdon · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kirby Dreher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-05-04 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Skogman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 69.4% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.1% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#1 Singles
23%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe